STFM Launches Initiative to Position Bookish Family Medicine in Wellness Systems

Mary Theobald MBA , in Annals of Family Medicine , 2020

Family physicians have been at the centre of the response to COVID-xix, ane–ii and the pandemic has underscored what was already an urgent need for more family physicians. The Clan of American Medical Colleges estimates a primary care physician shortage of up to 55,200 by 2033. three

Over the past few decades, nearly family physicians take transitioned from private practice to employed practices. 4 Throughout this transition—for a number of reasons—there has been a general reduction in scope of practice, in spite of evidence that primary intendance is "associated with improve health outcomes, lower costs, and greater wellness equity." v

To address the changing employment landscape for bookish family physicians, faculty, and learners, the Society of Teachers of Family unit Medicine has launched a new initiative to:

•

preserve comprehensive practice for family physicians and family unit medicine faculty who wish to practice broad scope

•

ensure that family medicine kinesthesia—including community preceptors in non-academic settings—have sufficient time and institutional resources to teach and meet academic and accreditation requirements

•

improve kinesthesia and learner well-being

•

transform family medicine training sites into clinical and education models of excellence

The initiative will be chaired past Christine Arenson, Medico. "This is a disquisitional fourth dimension for family unit medicine," said Dr Arenson. "We have the evidence we need that team-based family medicine, with physicians operating with a broad scope of do, is critical to better health and health disinterestedness while reducing the total cost of wellness treat our nation. And nevertheless we besides know that traditionally structured health care systems are not designed or prepared to meet this mission."

As the chair of the initiative, Dr Arenson will work with STFM staff to convene workgroups to develop and deliver training, build connections with wellness systems leaders, and abet for family medicine.

Specifically, the initiative will:

Train Family Medicine Educators and Learners on the Business organization of Medicine

Considering almost family physicians are employed by health intendance systems, information technology is of import that doctor preparation leads to an understanding of the business of medicine and how organisation leaders make decisions. This knowledge is fundamental to business-based solutions that incorporate the needs of medical education, family unit medicine, and health systems.

Brand the Business Case for Investment in Primary Care/Family Medicine

There aren't enough family physicians to run into the nation's health intendance needs, three and there is a shortage of family medicine kinesthesia. 6 Faculty are struggling with workload/administrative burden/competing priorities. 7 Communications to health care system leaders will abet for equitable resource allocation and solutions that meet the needs of family physicians and family medicine training programs.

Family unit Health

J. Weiss , in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001

The very diversified topic of family health is currently receiving increasing attending from different disciplines and different directions within psychology. This is especially evident in the areas of clinical and family psychology, gender-specific research, and wellness psychology. In this article, important theories and empirical results from these fields are summarized in a systematic overview which is divided into the following sections: (a) the bidirectional connections between family unit dimensions and the health of family members (eastward.g., the mother), (b) systemic concepts similar 'psychosomatic families' or 'family mental health,' (c) family resources in terms of coping capabilities or 'salutogenetic' and regenerative variables of family life, and (d) differential aspects of family health, i.e., differences between the developmental stages of the family unit life course, differences between family structures, and main results from gender-specific research.

Read full chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767038353

Principles of Primary Care of Older Adults

Gregg A. Warshaw MD , in Ham's Primary Care Geriatrics , 2022

Relationships and Family Are Crucial to Health and Survival

Medical students are taught to obtain a family history of illness (e.g., Who had what? Who died of what?). However, in geriatric medicine, a family history is ofttimes more useful if it is reframed to include the social and relational context of a person's living situation and care network (e.g., Who lives with the patient? Who provides support? Who should be consulted if a surrogate conclusion maker is needed? What are the dynamics within the family unit?). This information is critical because it can be a harsh world for people who are old and limited past inability, and they need assistance. Things they may demand help with can include maintaining a household, managing medications, doing personal care activities (such as bathing), navigating the healthcare system, and deciding what to do when new symptoms develop. Not surprisingly then, the availability of family and/or an established circle of friends has a tremendous impact on health outcomes and overall quality of life. Without such bonds, older persons are at high hazard for isolation, depression, and institutionalization (Fig. i.5).

Budgeted one's later years in an established long-term human relationship, with the intimate knowledge and actual obligations such a human relationship implies, provides a congenital-in caregiving dyad. Ideally each tin can aid the other equally issues develop, "in sickness and in health," thereby reducing the bodily dangers and limitations ofliving alone. However, not everyone can be and so blest, and in most partnerships one dies or becomes disabled before the other, so couplehood is but a fractional respond. If there is a younger generation, the loyalty of good family bonds can immeasurably enhance the security and quality of the life of an older person. Ofttimes, based on traditional gender roles, a girl or daughter-in-law is compelled to stride forwards to fulfill this function, although men are increasingly caregivers likewise. The caregiver role often subjects the caregiver to stress and an increased likelihood of illnesses, such as acute infections and depression (run across Chs. 3 and 19 Ch. iii Ch. 19 ). Even so, if done well, caregiving, which may continue for years, can be experienced every bit a profound responsibility that enhances life for both members of the dyad.Box 1.2 lists some of the areas in which a well-informed, well-supported family unit caregiver tin can enhance the health and life of a intendance recipient. Here the primary care clinician tin exist invaluable by caring directly or indirectly for the caregiver'due south own health and by assisting the caregiver in obtaining access to bachelor resources.

Awarding of Human Genome Information to Clinical Practice

Geoffrey S. Ginsburg , in Genomic and Personalized Medicine (Second Edition), 2013

Family History

Family health history (FHH) is a simple yet invaluable tool for the delivery of personal health risk data (see Chapter 26). Reflecting the circuitous combination of shared genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, a robust FHH tin can approximate genetic/genomic risk information and integrate it into patient care. FHH assessments identify persons at higher risk for disease, enabling preemptive and preventive steps, including lifestyle changes, wellness screenings, testing, and early treatment every bit appropriate (see Tabular array 17.1). As such, FHH holds tremendous potential for improving preventive healthcare across broad, diverse populations in a personally relevant style. Withal, the assessment and integration of FHH information has not been embraced by the healthcare community and remains a largely untapped resources (Guttmacher et al., 2004). The challenge of incorporating FHH into the public'due south health involves three essential components: (i) attainable and standardized collection methods, (2) healthcare provider access to the data, and (3) clinical conclusion support for estimation and utilize. Currently, the collection of FHH information may be incomplete, may be difficult to interpret, and/or may vary significantly in content among a patient'due south healthcare providers. In addition, providers may have insufficient knowledge and preparation to accurately interpret FHH for risk of inherited genetic syndromes and/or common complex weather condition (Rich et al., 2004).

Table 17.one. Risks associated with having offset-degree relative with affliction

Status Prevalence odds ratio References
Type 2 diabetes 2.3–2.8 Hindorff et al., 2011; Holleman et al., 2004
Coronary avenue disease iv.5 Simpson et al., 2006
Colon cancer 2.0–ii.6 Hoshida et al., 2008
Breast cancer 1.half-dozen–2.0 Hoshida et al., 2008
Lung cancer 1.7–2.five Hoshida et al., 2008

Tabular array adapted from Goodman and Walsh, 2001.

Read full affiliate

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123822277000173

The Oregon Narrative

Mike Bonetto , in Wellness Reform Policy to Do, 2017

The Family Health Insurance Assistance Programme

The Family Health Insurance Assistance Programme (FHIAP) was established in 1997 later on Oregon'due south employer mandate did not receive the necessary federal waivers. FHIAP provided health insurance premium assistance to Oregonians who were non eligible for Medicaid and had incomes below 170% of the federal poverty level. FHIAP offered monthly premium subsidies to adults on a sliding scale, ranging from fifty% to 95% of the cost of insurance. All children under the age of nineteen were subsidized at 100% regardless of family income. The adult members' monthly subsidies decreased every bit their income increased.

FHIAP offered members numerous health insurance program choices offered by a variety of carriers throughout the state. The plans offered comprehensive medical benefits including prescription drug coverage, reasonable out-of-pocket costs, and a wide array of provider pick dependent on the carrier chosen. FHIAP contracted with five big domestic individual private market carriers in Oregon to provide plans, many of which were available statewide.

From its inception, FHIAP enrollment was limited by the amount of state and federal funds available. FHIAP provided subsidies to approximately 15,000 individuals annually and was generally closed to new enrollees and at times there were xl,000 to 50,000 people on a waiting list.

Read full affiliate

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scientific discipline/article/pii/B978012809827100001X

Microbicides

Polly F. Harrison , Trisha 50. Lamphear , in The AIDS Pandemic, 2005

International Family Wellness (IFH)

IFH is an international non-governmental system in the United Kingdom dedicated to improving the sexual and reproductive health and rights of disadvantaged people in resource-poor settings. In a project funded by the European Community, the UK Department for International Development (DFID), and the International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM), IFH is collaborating with the Global Campaign for Microbicides, the Brotherhood, and other partners in efforts to raise awareness of microbicides amidst European donors, manufacture, regulatory bodies, and the scientific customs; among developing-land policy-makers; and amongst HIV/AIDS, international development, women's health, and other activist organizations in Africa, Asia, and Europe.

Read full chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012465271250011X

Family Health History and Wellness Risk Cess in Health Intendance

Lori A. Orlando , R. Ryanne Wu , in Genomic and Precision Medicine (Third Edition), 2017

Why Family Health History Is Primal to HRAs

Family unit health history is an unassuming and ofttimes disregarded, but essential information element in HRAs. For many conditions, family health history is the strongest predictor of disease risk and for some, such equally hereditary cancer syndromes, it is the only predictor (and thus the just component of the HRA) (see Table 13.1). An example of the impact of family health history on disease adventure is Type II Diabetes, where a kickoff-degree relative (parent or child) with the disease increases an individual'southward risk from an average of 3.2% to 14.3% [6]. In some cases, excluding a family health history can atomic number 82 to missing those at highest risk for developing a condition. For example, many risk assessments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ask nearly environmental exposures (such as smoking and asbestos), but do not ask most family history; withal, those with alpha-i-antitrypsin deficiency, a hereditary condition that runs in families, are at the highest adventure of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease even without an environmental exposure [7]. Renal jail cell carcinoma, a tumor of the kidney, is some other example. Almost all risk assessments include smoking, alcohol, and practice, and some include family unit members with renal jail cell carcinoma, but most practise not ask nigh a family history of other cancers even though renal cell carcinoma is part of the constellation of cancers that can occur in two hereditary cancer syndromes, Lynch and Von Hippel–Lindau [8]. While those with hereditary cancer syndromes or alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency are only a small proportion of those developing these two conditions, they are the ones at the highest risk of developing disease.

In addition to being highly predictive, family unit health history likewise serves as the basis for a number of evidence-based guidelines that not simply indicate the level of disease take chances associated with a given combination of affected relatives, simply also actions to take to manage risk. For example, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network'southward guidelines for breast and ovarian cancer recommend BRCA testing if an individuals' first-degree relative (parents or child) developed breast cancer at age 45 or younger [9]. Another example is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. If an individual has a relative with the condition, then screening is recommended when they are aged 50 or older [x,xi].

Thus family unit health history is the only data element in HRAs that is both highly predictive and actionable in combination with other data elements and past itself. Unfortunately family health history is oftentimes difficult to obtain. Individuals often do non know much about their relatives' health and what they practice know is often piecemeal or may be inaccurate [12]. This leads to the trouble that one of the almost informative data elements in HRAs is also one of the more than difficult to collect.

Read full affiliate

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scientific discipline/article/pii/B978012800681800013X

Family unit Health History and Wellness Risk Cess For Cardiovascular Disease in Health Care

Lori A. Orlando , Rebekah R. Wu , in Genomic and Precision Medicine (Third Edition), 2018

Why Family Health History is Cardinal to HRAs

Family health history is an unassuming and often overlooked, but essential data element in HRAs. For many conditions, family health history is the strongest predictor of disease risk and for some, such as hereditary cardiovascular syndromes, it is the merely predictor (and thus the merely component of the HRA) (see Table 1.i). An example of the affect of family health history on disease risk is blazon Two diabetes, where a first degree relative (parent or child) with the disease increases an individual's risk from an average of 3.2% to 14.3% [6]. In some cases, excluding a family health history can atomic number 82 to missing those at highest risk for developing a condition. For case, many chance assessments for chronic obstructive pulmonary illness ask near ecology exposures (such as smoking and asbestos) but do not enquire nearly family unit history; however, those with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, a hereditary condition that runs in families, are at the highest risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease even without an environmental exposure [7]. Renal cell carcinoma, a tumor of the kidney, is some other case. Nearly all risk assessments include smoking, alcohol, and do, and some include family members with renal jail cell carcinoma, but most do not ask most a family history of other cancers even though renal jail cell carcinoma is part of the constellation of cancers that can occur in two hereditary cancer syndromes, Lynch and Von Hippel–Lindau [8]. While those with hereditary cancer syndromes or alpha-one-antitrypsin deficiency are only a small proportion of those developing these two conditions, they are the ones at the highest risk of developing affliction.

Every bit mentioned earlier, the Framingham study and the resultant Framingham risk scores inaugurated the gamble assessment field and pushed information technology steadily forrad for the first two decades. All the same, currently, the three widely used cardiovascular risk scores: Framingham (which has multiple versions and multiple outcomes including atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart affliction, and congestive heart failure) (https://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/risk-functions/index.php), Reynold's gamble score (for middle and stroke risk) (http://world wide web.reynoldsriskscore.org/), and the pooled equation for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk recommended in the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines [9] (http://tools.acc.org/ascvd-adventure-calculator/), exercise not include family wellness history of cardiovascular affliction though an earlier version of Framingham did. To adjust for this missing information, the Canadian Cholesterol guidelines multiply the Framingham adventure score by two for an individual who has a beginning degree relative with a cardiovascular outcome before age 60 [10]. Similarly, European guidelines recommend multiplying the chance score results by 1.7 in women and 2.0 in men [11].

In add-on to being highly predictive, family health history as well serves as the basis for a number of evidence-based guidelines that non but indicate the level of disease risk associated with a given combination of afflicted relatives but as well deportment to have to manage adventure. For case, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's guidelines for breast and ovarian cancer recommend BRCA testing if an individuals' first degree relative (parents or child) developed breast cancer at historic period 45 or younger [12]. Another case is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. If an private has a relative with the status, then screening is recommended when they are aged 50 or older [xiii,14].

Despite the fact that the cardiovascular field was early on to begin to explore the benefits of risk cess, there is a complete absence of literature and guidelines addressing the role of family history, even for the many hereditary cardiovascular syndromes, except for Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH). For FH, at that place are now 4 different screening tools (Simon Broom, Dutch Lipid Clinic Network, Med Ped, and the newly published FAMCAT)—all include family unit history. Ane important aspect of these hereditary weather, which include many cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias, equally well equally FH, is that (for most) there are steps that tin be taken to manage risk. For instance, there is now a drug class (PCSK-9 inhibitors) approved specifically for use in individuals with FH, echocardiogram screening for cardiomyopathies, and EKG screening for arrhythmias. Another highly important point to consider is the risk to relatives when a family member is found to have a hereditary condition. In these cases, it's important to inform and screen those individuals at-risk. Processes to facilitate this screening, called cascade screening, are being explored and accept been most closely studied in Europe around FH.

Thus, family health history is the but data element in HRAs that is both highly predictive and actionable in combination with other data elements and past itself. Unfortunately, family health history is ofttimes hard to obtain. Individuals often do not know much about their relatives' wellness and what they practice know is often piecemeal or may exist inaccurate [fifteen]. This leads to the trouble that one of the most informative data elements in HRAs is as well ane of the more difficult to collect.

Read full chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128018125000160

Clinical Decision Support for Personalized Medicine

Brandon M. Welch , ... Kevin S. Hughes , in Clinical Determination Back up (Second Edition), 2014

fourteen.4.1 Family health history

A consummate family wellness history has long been identified every bit one of the nearly of import tools for assessing disease risks ( Rich et al., 2004). The collection and interpretation of family wellness history provides a price-effective glimpse of the potential genetic risks possessed by a patient. Different genomic information, the family health history is able to capture how the genome interacts with social and environmental factors to determine the phenotypes of family unit members. Every bit germ line genetic mutations are passed from ane generation to the side by side, and then too are the phenotypic characteristics of such mutations. Indeed, a positive family history tin be a stronger predictor than available genetic tests for several multifactorial diseases, such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer (Yoon et al., 2002).

While some might believe that the utility of the family health history is becoming less important with the advent of loftier-throughput genetic testing and the imminent clinical adoption of whole genome sequencing, family unit health history will go on to remain relevant for a long time and volition likely become more important in the future (Guttmacher et al., 2004). The complexities of genetics – in particular, variable penetrance and variants of unknown significance – volition require 1'south genome to be analyzed in the context of the family history to increase the accuracy of assessment (Scheuner et al., 1997). Health Information technology and CDS solutions can be leveraged to back up the collection and estimation of family health history in back up of personalized medicine (Crane and Raymond, 2003).

Ideally, a clinician should collect a complete, three-generational family history from every patient to determine who is at increased risk for disease and who may exist advisable for genetic testing, referral to an appropriate specialist or genetic counselor, and/or personalized preventative measures. Unfortunately, in do, family unit health history is poorly collected. Physicians typically collect family unit history from one-half of new patients and less than a quarter of returning patients (Acheson et al., 2000). The primary barriers identified include lack of time, lack of reimbursement, and lack of expertise (Rich et al., 2004; Acton et al., 2000; Bernhardt et al., 1987). Most family history discussions are limited to a few minutes – not enough time to collect a thorough family health history from the patient (Acheson et al., 2000). Moreover, even when clinicians endeavour to collect a family health history, patients are unprepared and fail to report of import information accurately (Dear et al., 1985).

In addition, family wellness history has been traditionally collected on newspaper, rendering it unusable for automatic CDS. Recently, pedigree drawing software has become available; however, these software packages are seldom used at the chief care level due to the big amount of data entry required by the clinician or staff and the express fourth dimension available. A proposed solution to obtain widespread electronic collection of a complete family history may exist to electronically gather the data directly from the patient (Guttmacher et al., 2004; Rich et al., 2004). A number of patient-centered family history collection tools such as the Surgeon General's My Family Health Portrait, (Online version of "My Family Health Portrait" available in English and Spanish, 2006) Hughes Risk Apps, (Ozanne et al., 2009) Health Heritage (Cohn et al., 2010), and ItRunsInMyFamily.com have been developed to allow data entry past the patient, at dwelling or in the clinician's waiting room. Effigy 14.3 provides an example of ane such organization. The goals of these solutions are to provide a complete family health history in a computable format, subtract the required staff workload, and back up clinicians' controlling abilities through CDS.

Effigy 14.3. Screenshot of the Surgeon General'south My Family Health Portrait.

 (Permission granted.)

fourteen.four.1.one Assessing take chances based on family history

Family unit wellness history is most often used as a preliminary risk assessment tool. As with genetic information in general, the estimation of a family health history is non a piffling job. While simple single-gene Mendelian disorders follow known inheritance patterns, such every bit autosomal ascendant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked, many adult-onset atmospheric condition do not follow strict inheritance patterns, including diabetes, centre disease, and cancer. Each disease volition have its own unique hazard profile based on the constellation of afflicted family unit members (Taylor et al., 2010). Typically, the greater the number, the more closely related, and the younger the historic period of onset of affected relatives in the family history, the greater the chance of disease to the proband Scheuner et al., 1997. Even so, the magnitude of risk varies greatly among diseases. Furthermore, certain genetic mutations, specially in cancer, are known to produce variable phenotypes among family members. For example, a Jewish individual with breast cancer at age 46 who also has melanoma and pancreatic cancer in the family unit is at high risk of having a BRCA2 mutation and thus ovarian cancer also. Clinicians must be enlightened of such subtleties in genetic syndromes, as they may otherwise miss the clues in the family history indicative of a detail genetic contribution.

At that place is a significant demand for CDS to support the complexities of interpreting family wellness history. CDS can exist used to assess family history to help determine who needs genetic counseling or testing, to help determine the significance of different mutations, and to aid determine the best management strategy. When it comes to the estimation of the family history, there are a number of guidelines and models available for many genetic conditions. An expanse where models and guidelines are quite advanced is in mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Several models have been developed to estimate the run a risk of having a BRCA mutation, including but non limited to BRCAPRO, the Myriad model, the Tyrer-Cuzick model, and BODICEA (Berry et al., 1997; Frank et al., 1998; Tyrer et al., 2004; Antoniou et al., 2004). These models crave the use of reckoner software, since the algorithms utilized are circuitous. Meet Figure 14.four.

Figure 14.4. Risk of chest cancer over fourth dimension using diverse chance models as displayed in Hughes Risk Apps.

 (Permission granted.)

In addition, a number of organizations accept developed guidelines to help decide which patients are eligible for testing, including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the US Preventive Services Task Forcefulness (USPSTF), and the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2013; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, 2012; American Higher of Medical Genetics, 1999). Although the guidelines are meant to exist used from memory or by using paper reminders without a computer, in reality they are then detailed and complex that they are seldom remembered or acted upon in the midst of a decorated clinic. Computerization of the guidelines through CDS is therefore required. To this stop, information technology is suggested that organizations publish guidelines not only as prose, but as well in a motorcar-readable format ready for employ in CDS (Dufour et al., 2006). Ideally, these machine-readable guidelines should be bachelor via a primal web-accessible service, as will exist described in further detail subsequently in the chapter.

Ideally, family history and other risk factors could exist submitted to various risk modeling and guideline services via a single software interface, with patient-specific assessments and recommendations returned in a mutual format. By taking a structured family history data and running information technology through established risk models and guidelines, the CDS software can help master care clinicians identify which patients crave testing or consultation by the specialist. In one case the patient gets to the specialist, the genetics professional or specialist has more time to collect a more than thorough and complete family history with boosted details, thereby increasing the accurateness of the models and providing the patient with the best adventure of having the right tests ordered and correct diagnosis made.

Emery and colleagues undertook some of the primeval and most comprehensive research on CDS tools for family history collection and gamble cess in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland in the late 1990s through the early 2000s (Emery 1999; Emery et al., 2000; Glasspool et al., 2001; Coulson et al., 2001; Emery 2005; Emery et al., 2007). The earlier version of the system they developed is known as RAGs, and the later version is known as GRAIDS. Their system was shown in an RCT to significantly increase the number of advisable referrals for genetic counseling according to prove-based practice guidelines (Emery 2005; Emery et al., 2007). More recently, ii software packages take been adult to help analyze the risk of being a BRCA mutation carrier: CancerGene and HughesRiskApps (HRA) (Ozanne et al., 2009; UTSW Medical Center, 2004). Both run the major hazard models, and recent evolution in HRA has begun to explore translating several guidelines (NCCN, etc.) into automobile-readable format and developing the algorithms needed to translate the family history in the context of the guidelines.

As an example of how HRA makes use of clinical guidelines, the prenatal module of HRA looks at the ethnicity and family history of a pregnant woman to help make up one's mind what prenatal genetic tests might be advisable. Prose guidelines were translated into automobile-readable format and the patient's family history and ethnicity (also entered by the patient) were then compared to these guidelines in order to suggest management and testing. For case, Ashkenazi Jews are routinely identified for possible Tay-Sachs testing, while women with a family history of mental retardation in male person relatives are flagged for fragile Ten testing.

fourteen.4.1.2 Family history standards

Although a number of solutions accept been bachelor to collect family wellness history and provide initial risk assessment, until just a few years ago there were no standards available to collect information in a consistent way that would support interoperability and reusability of the family history data and the interpretative algorithms. Commonly, the family unit health history would be represented equally free text within the electronic health tape (EHR) or using generic terms such every bit "family unit history of cancer" with no granularity as to which relatives had the disease and their age of onset, rendering the information inadequate for use in constructing a complete pedigree necessary for authentic risk cess. Key to developing a scalable approach to CDS for family health history is the definition and widespread adoption of a set of standards for the consequent drove and storage of this information. To address this need, the American Health Information Community (AHIC) convened a workgroup to define the core data ready needed for family health history, published in 2008 (Family unit Wellness History Multi-Stakeholder Workgroup, 2008). In parallel, the Health Level seven (HL7) Clinical Genomics Special Interest Group has adult a standard pedigree model that facilitates the exchange of family health history information in a way that supports pedigree construction and CDS. The standard was subsequently accepted past the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Healthcare Data Technology Standards Panel (HITSP). This standardization facilitated the evolution of a number of patient-centric family wellness history collection tools adhering to the core information set. Several family unit health history software packages take adopted the HL7 pedigree standard, including the My Family Health Portrait tool and HughesRiskApps.

Although the AHIC core information set, HL7 family pedigree model, and subsequent family unit history collection tools have fabricated it easier to collect family unit history information from patients, no EHR vendor, to engagement, has adopted these standards. In the Us, Stage 2 Meaningful Use requirements are get-go to mandate the collection of a structured family health history; however, only first-caste relatives are required (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2012). Moreover, the native EHR interfaces are typically non convenient and are time-consuming to use. Furthermore, the efforts of the clinician in filling out the family history section is somewhat wasted, since there is typically no CDS available to analyze the data, nor is a pedigree drawn. A modular approach to EHR integration might abrogate this problem (Drohan et al., 2012). As 1 example of an attempt in this area, the Health Heritage family history platform allows patient-entered family history and has been integrated with the Epic EHR system. Unfortunately, this organization pushes data into Epic every bit a free text notation rather than every bit structured data ready that can populate the family history section of the EHR (Cohn et al., 2010).

Read full chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123984760000142

Selected NGOs Agile in HIV and Spider web Links

Sahai Burrowes , Laurence Peiperl , in Global HIV/AIDS Medicine, 2008

Where to get more information

The FHI website (world wide web.fhi.org/en/index.htm) has a wealth of information on the organization'south HIV piece of work. Information technology contains:

•

policy briefs on the major bug in HIV care, treatment, and prevention (world wide web.fhi.org/en/HIVAIDS/pub/fact/index.htm)

•

overviews of FHI'southward land programs (www.fhi.org/en/HIVAIDS/state/index.htm)

•

a large library of FHI publications, curricula, manuals and programme tools for free download (www.fhi.org/en/HIVAIDS/pub/alphabetize.htm).

State-specific resources tin be constitute by scrolling through the site's land pages (www.fhi.org/en/HIVAIDS/country/index.htm).

Read full chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scientific discipline/commodity/pii/B978141602882650068X